Baby Pokemon
+4
Coolchill214
Carebarrys
Stardust
ShinyTurtwig
8 posters
Page 1 of 1
Baby Pokemon
Do you think that some Pokemon that have no past evolutions or they dont evolve will have baby forms? Like Kangaskan, Tauros, Miltank, etc.
ShinyTurtwig- Tadpole
- Points : 0
Posts : 11
Points : 28
Join date : 2010-08-09
Age : 29
Re: Baby Pokemon
Well, pokemon like Tauros should definitely never have a baby pokemon. It'll be cute most likely, and ruin his bad boy image.. And we can't have that happening
Kangaskan, yea, I can see that would definitely have put it out there before. But really, it already carries around it's baby, which would indeed grow into a Khangaskan...
They'll definitely be some new evolutions, but possibly for the 3rd and 4thGenerations
Kangaskan, yea, I can see that would definitely have put it out there before. But really, it already carries around it's baby, which would indeed grow into a Khangaskan...
They'll definitely be some new evolutions, but possibly for the 3rd and 4thGenerations
Stardust- Jr. Trainer
- Points : 12
Posts : 245
Points : 263
Join date : 2010-08-10
Age : 27
Location : Australia, behind my computer screen.
Re: Baby Pokemon
The pokemon in generation 5 are supposed to be all-new, which was stated by the geame freak director.
if they have baby forms it wont be many and it would be in the national pokedex
oh well =( i love the luvdisc evolution though
if they have baby forms it wont be many and it would be in the national pokedex
oh well =( i love the luvdisc evolution though
Carebarrys- Tadpole
- Points : 0
Posts : 26
Points : 43
Join date : 2010-08-10
Re: Baby Pokemon
meapers wrote:The pokemon in generation 5 are supposed to be all-new, which was stated by the geame freak director.
if they have baby forms it wont be many and it would be in the national pokedex
oh well =( i love the luvdisc evolution though
Yes, they have stated that all the pokemon will be new. And until you get the pokedex, will you be able to get pokemon somehow connected to pokemon of older generations.
I personally think that's great, surprises around the corner ^^....
I know it looks like one, but how do you really know it's a Luvdisc evolution? Because it would have been stated by Cocoro.
Stardust- Jr. Trainer
- Points : 12
Posts : 245
Points : 263
Join date : 2010-08-10
Age : 27
Location : Australia, behind my computer screen.
Re: Baby Pokemon
I like your thinking Shiny Turtwig.Your thinking back in Johto,when they made Pichu,Magby,Elekid,and Smoochum.I honestly hope they do not make Basic Pokemon for Miltank.I couldnt picture what they would make out of it.The Pokemon I stated before werent a dissapointment.Smoochum maybe a bit,but otherwise,not a dissapointment.
Coolchill214- Moderator
- Points : 37
Posts : 560
Points : 506
Join date : 2010-08-10
Age : 24
Location : Westopolis
Re: Baby Pokemon
I dont think they should have baby forms. It would ruin what they look like right now.
BicBoi- Skilled Trainer
- Points : 25
Posts : 562
Points : 574
Join date : 2010-08-11
Age : 30
Location : I dont know.
Re: Baby Pokemon
I hope we don't get an overload of then like Gen 4 gave us D:
So many evolutions oh my gosh @_@
So many evolutions oh my gosh @_@
RedCharmander- Tadpole
- Points : 0
Posts : 3
Points : 5
Join date : 2010-08-14
Age : 28
Location : Kanto
Re: Baby Pokemon
I think Cubone is Kangaskhan's child, they do look terribly alike, maybe that'll be a mystery we never uncover.
Razor- Tadpole
- Points : 0
Posts : 44
Points : 52
Join date : 2010-08-17
Re: Baby Pokemon
Razor wrote:I think Cubone is Kangaskhan's child, they do look terribly alike, maybe that'll be a mystery we never uncover.
Uhh, no dice. It evolves into Marowak. Fail by you haha.
Stardust- Jr. Trainer
- Points : 12
Posts : 245
Points : 263
Join date : 2010-08-10
Age : 27
Location : Australia, behind my computer screen.
Re: Baby Pokemon
I believe he knows that :p He was just proposing a suggestion.
I would hope not. I mean, Kangaskhan is a normal type while Cubone is ground type .I wonder how that would work.
I would hope not. I mean, Kangaskhan is a normal type while Cubone is ground type .I wonder how that would work.
Guest- Guest
Re: Baby Pokemon
Stardust you dumbass think,
If Cubone's mother is dead and Kangskhan is only female then that should slap an idea into your mind.
If Cubone's mother is dead and Kangskhan is only female then that should slap an idea into your mind.
Razor- Tadpole
- Points : 0
Posts : 44
Points : 52
Join date : 2010-08-17
Re: Baby Pokemon
baby pokemon exist only for fanservices purpose,they do nothing else in the game other than being cute and weak.from a battle point of view,they're not exciting.i'm not gonna hate it if they bring a baby or two out but all that will happen is i might try them out once for kicks and then nothing
WingedDivinity- Tadpole
- Points : 25
Posts : 93
Points : 104
Join date : 2010-08-18
Age : 38
Location : Quebec,Canada
Re: Baby Pokemon
WingedDivinity wrote:baby pokemon exist only for fanservices purpose,they do nothing else in the game other than being cute and weak.from a battle point of view,they're not exciting.i'm not gonna hate it if they bring a baby or two out but all that will happen is i might try them out once for kicks and then nothing
You can't really say that... Sure, they use Happiny as a fan-service (With Brock) But still, I'm glad, cause they can be taught some awesome egg moves, and there so cute anyway ^^ And it gives me satisfaction when I see a pokemon begin to evolve!
Obviously, yea, I hope they don't bring in a motherload of them but a few new ones would be nice
Stardust- Jr. Trainer
- Points : 12
Posts : 245
Points : 263
Join date : 2010-08-10
Age : 27
Location : Australia, behind my computer screen.
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|